Optical time-domain reflectometer (otdr) event detection and light power level measurement-based fiber optic link certification

ABSTRACT

In some examples, OTDR event detection and light power level measurement-based fiber optic link certification may include performing, at one end of a device under test (DUT) of a network, a light power level measurement. An OTDR measurement may be performed at the one end of the DUT to detect at least one event associated with the DUT. Based on analysis of the light power level measurement and the OTDR measurement, an event classification may be generated to classify the at least one event associated with the DUT.

PRIORITY

The present application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d) toEuropean Patent Application No. 20306336.7, having a filing date of Nov.5, 2020, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference inits entirety.

BACKGROUND

A fiber optic cable may include one or more optical fibers that may beused to transmit light from a source to a destination. The opticalfibers of the fiber optic cable may be referred to as fiber optic links.Fiber optic cables may represent a network element of a fiber opticnetwork. In this regard, other types of network elements may includeoptical connectors, optical splices, optical couplers, splitters, andoptical switches. In some cases, a fiber optic link may need to becertified by accurately characterizing events along the fiber opticlink.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

Features of the present disclosure are illustrated by way of example andnot limited in the following figure(s), in which like numerals indicatelike elements, in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates an architectural layout of an optical time-domainreflectometer (OTDR) event detection and light power levelmeasurement-based fiber optic link certification apparatus in accordancewith an example of the present disclosure;

FIG. 2 illustrates a fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) PON fiber network betweenan OLT and an ONT to illustrate operation of the OTDR event detectionand light power level measurement-based fiber optic link certificationapparatus of FIG. 1 , in accordance with an example of the presentdisclosure;

FIG. 3 illustrates a logical flow to illustrate operation of the OTDRevent detection and light power level measurement-based fiber optic linkcertification apparatus of FIG. 1 , in accordance with an example of thepresent disclosure;

FIG. 4 illustrates an OTDR table to illustrate OTDR event detection, inaccordance with an example of the present disclosure;

FIG. 5 illustrates another OTDR table to illustrate operation of theOTDR event detection and light power level measurement-based fiber opticlink certification apparatus of FIG. 1 , in accordance with an exampleof the present disclosure;

FIG. 6 illustrates a user interface display to illustrate operation ofthe OTDR event detection and light power level measurement-based fiberoptic link certification apparatus of FIG. 1 , in accordance with anexample of the present disclosure;

FIG. 7 illustrates an example block diagram for OTDR event detection andlight power level measurement-based fiber optic link certification inaccordance with an example of the present disclosure;

FIG. 8 illustrates a flowchart of an example method for OTDR eventdetection and light power level measurement-based fiber optic linkcertification in accordance with an example of the present disclosure;and

FIG. 9 illustrates a further example block diagram for OTDR eventdetection and light power level measurement-based fiber optic linkcertification in accordance with another example of the presentdisclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

For simplicity and illustrative purposes, the present disclosure isdescribed by referring mainly to examples. In the following description,numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thoroughunderstanding of the present disclosure. It will be readily apparenthowever, that the present disclosure may be practiced without limitationto these specific details. In other instances, some methods andstructures have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarilyobscure the present disclosure.

Throughout the present disclosure, the terms “a” and “an” are intendedto denote at least one of a particular element. As used herein, the term“includes” means includes but not limited to, the term “including” meansincluding but not limited to. The term “based on” means based at leastin part on.

OTDR event detection and light power level measurement-based fiber opticlink certification apparatuses, methods for OTDR event detection andlight power level measurement-based fiber optic link certification, andnon-transitory computer readable media for OTDR event detection andlight power level measurement-based fiber optic link certification aredisclosed herein. The apparatuses, methods, and non-transitory computerreadable media disclosed herein may utilize, in combination, a lightpower level measurement by a power meter and an OTDR measurement by anOTDR event detector to identify an event type for a device under test(DUT) of a network, such as a passive optical network (PON) network. Forexample, the DUT may include a section of the PON network between anoptical network terminal (ONT) and a splitter. In this regard, the powermeter and the OTDR event detector may be implemented in a device thatmay be designated as an “Optimeter”.

With respect to the apparatuses, methods, and non-transitory computerreadable media disclosed herein, an OTDR may utilize Rayleighbackscattering and Fresnel reflection signals to monitor events withrespect to a fiber optic network. One of the unique advantages of OTDRtesting is that it utilizes access to one end of a fiber optic cablethat may include a plurality of fiber optic links. Since distance andattenuation measurements are based on Rayleigh optical backscatteringand the Fresnel reflection principle, returned light may be analyzeddirectly from the one end of a fiber optic link of the fiber opticcable.

With respect to fiber optic link characterization in a network, such asa passive optical network (PON) network, a DUT that may include asection of the PON network between an ONT and a splitter may need to becertified. In this regard, the PON network may include one or moresplitters, and the certification may need to be performed between theONT and a splitter that is closest to the ONT. The certification mayinclude proper classification of all events associated with the DUT. Forexample, for a PON network, a DUT may include an event, such as asplitter disposed between an optical line terminal (OLT) and an opticalnetwork terminal (ONT). In this regard, it is technically challenging toaccurately classify events, such as a splitter, since an OTDRmeasurement may identify the event as an end of fiber event instead ofas a splitter.

In order to address the aforementioned technical challenges, theapparatuses, methods, and non-transitory computer readable mediadisclosed herein provide for accurate classification of events, such asa splitter, for a DUT for a network, such a PON network, by utilizinglight power level measurement in combination with an OTDR measurement.In this regard, based on the utilization of the combined light powerlevel measurement and the OTDR measurement (e.g., OTDR event detection)to classify an event, such as a splitter, an OLT may be disposed afterthe splitter. The measurement of G-PON wavelength (e.g., 1490 nm) orXGS-PON (or 10G-PON) wavelength (e.g., 1577 nm) light level may beutilized to confirm that an OLT is present beyond an end of the DUT. Yetfurther, utilization of the light power level measurement may providefor a determination of whether the total loss for the associated fiberoptic network is within acceptable bounds.

According to examples disclosed herein, the apparatuses, methods, andnon-transitory computer readable media disclosed herein provide forutilization of light power level measurement to enhance OTDR event typedetection. In this regard, further analysis may be performed byutilizing multi pulses (e.g., short pulses, and then relatively longpulses as disclosed herein).

According to examples disclosed herein, the apparatuses, methods, andnon-transitory computer readable media disclosed herein provide foranalysis of combining of an OTDR event detection and light power levelmeasurement to enhance event type, using an optical reflectometer suchas an OTDR without disconnecting a fiber optic cable (or a fiber opticlink of the fiber optic cable).

For the apparatus, methods, and non-transitory computer readable mediadisclosed herein, the elements of the apparatus, methods, andnon-transitory computer readable media disclosed herein may be anycombination of hardware and programming to implement the functionalitiesof the respective elements. In some examples described herein, thecombinations of hardware and programming may be implemented in a numberof different ways. For example, the programming for the elements may beprocessor executable instructions stored on a non-transitorymachine-readable storage medium and the hardware for the elements mayinclude a processing resource to execute those instructions. In theseexamples, a computing device implementing such elements may include themachine-readable storage medium storing the instructions and theprocessing resource to execute the instructions, or the machine-readablestorage medium may be separately stored and accessible by the computingdevice and the processing resource. In some examples, some elements maybe implemented in circuitry.

FIG. 1 illustrates an architectural layout of a OTDR event detection andlight power level measurement-based fiber optic link certificationapparatus (hereinafter also referred to as “apparatus 100”) inaccordance with an example of the present disclosure.

As disclosed herein, the apparatus 100 may be designated an “Optimeter”,and may include a power meter and an optical reflectometer such as anOTDR.

Referring to FIG. 1 , the apparatus 100 may include a power meter 102that is executed by at least one hardware processor (e.g., the hardwareprocessor 702 of FIG. 7 , and/or the hardware processor 904 of FIG. 9 ),to perform, at one end of a device under test (DUT) 104 of a network, alight power level measurement 106.

An optical time-domain reflectometer (OTDR) event detector 108 that isexecuted by at least one hardware processor (e.g., the hardwareprocessor 702 of FIG. 7 , and/or the hardware processor 904 of FIG. 9 )may perform, at the one end of the DUT 104, an OTDR measurement 110 todetect at least one event associated with the DUT 104.

An event classifier 112 that is executed by at least one hardwareprocessor (e.g., the hardware processor 702 of FIG. 7 , and/or thehardware processor 904 of FIG. 9 ) may generate, based on analysis ofthe light power level measurement 106 and the OTDR measurement 110, anevent classification 114 to classify the at least one event associatedwith the DUT 104. In this regard, the at least one event may includeevents such as optical events, loss incurred, reflectance incurred, asplitter, and other such events, to thus fully certify/qualify the DUT104 that includes the fiber network section from an ONT to a splitter asdisclosed herein.

According to examples disclosed herein, the event classifier 112 maygenerate, based on analysis of the light power level measurement 106 andthe OTDR measurement 110, the event classification 114 to classify, as asplitter 116 disposed at a second opposite end of the DUT 104, the atleast one event previously identified by the OTDR measurement 110 as anend of DUT.

According to examples disclosed herein, the DUT 104 may include asection of a PON network between an optical network terminal (ONT) and asplitter 116.

According to examples disclosed herein, the power meter 102 may furtherinclude a light power level analyzer 118 that is executed by at leastone hardware processor (e.g., the hardware processor 702 of FIG. 7 ,and/or the hardware processor 904 of FIG. 9 ) to determine, based on ananalysis of the light power level measurement 106, whether a light powerlevel associated with the DUT 104 is below a specified light power level(e.g., −35 dBm, or another value that may represent a low power level(LPL) based on sensitivity of associated hardware, photodiodes,acquisition chain instrument sensitivity, etc.). Further, the lightpower level analyzer 118 may generate, based on a determination that thelight power level associated with the DUT 104 is below the specifiedlight power level, an indication that there is no light on a passiveoptical network (PON) wavelength. In this regard, according to examplesdisclosed herein, the event classifier 112 may generate, based onanalysis of the light power level measurement 106 and the OTDRmeasurement 110, the event classification 114 to classify the at leastone event associated with the DUT 104 by generating, based on the lightpower level measurement 106 and the OTDR measurement 110 at a relativelyshort pulse width (e.g., 10 ns) and at a relatively long pulse width(e.g., 1 microsecond), the event classification 114 to classify the atleast one event associated with the DUT 104 as an end of DUT. In thisregard, according to examples disclosed herein, an actual end of the DUT104 may be disposed at a distance from the splitter 116, where thedistance is less than the relatively short pulse width when testing fromthe end of the DUT determined by the OTDR measurement 110. In otherwords, the short pulse width may be sufficient to certify from the ONTto the splitter, but is unable to “pass” the splitter loss and hencecannot detect the splitter, while the long pulse width can pass thesplitter. Alternatively, the event classifier 112 may generate, based onanalysis of the light power level measurement 106 and the OTDRmeasurement 110, the event classification 114 to classify the at leastone event associated with the DUT 104 by generating, based on the lightpower level measurement 106 and the OTDR measurement 110 at a relativelyshort pulse width (e.g., 10 ns) and at a relatively long pulse width(e.g., 1 microsecond), the event classification 114 to classify the atleast one event associated with the DUT 104 as an inactive optical lineterminal (OLT) 122. In this regard, according to examples disclosedherein, an actual end of the DUT 104 may be disposed at a distance fromthe splitter 116, where the distance is greater than the relativelyshort pulse width when testing from the end of the DUT determined by theOTDR measurement 110.

According to examples disclosed herein, the light power level analyzer118 may determine, based on an analysis of the light power levelmeasurement 106, whether a light power level associated with the DUT 104is below a light power level threshold 120 (e.g., −27 dBm, or anothervalue based on sensitivity of receptors for a PON network) and above aspecified light power level (e.g., −35 dBm). The light power levelanalyzer 118 may generate, based on a determination that the light powerlevel associated with the DUT 104 is below the light power levelthreshold 120 and above the specified light power level, an indicationof a low passive optical network (PON) signal. In this regard, accordingto examples disclosed herein, the event classifier 112 may generate,based on the light power level measurement 106 and the OTDR measurement110 at a relatively short pulse width (e.g., 10 ns), the eventclassification 114 to classify the at least one event associated withthe DUT 104 as a splitter.

According to examples disclosed herein, the light power level analyzer118 may determine, based on an analysis of the light power levelmeasurement 106, whether a light power level associated with the DUT 104is above a light power level threshold 120 (e.g., −27 dBm for a G-PONnetwork). In this regard, the light power level analyzer 118 maygenerate, based on a determination that the light power level associatedwith the DUT 104 is above the light power level threshold 120, anindication of a high passive optical network (PON) signal.

Operation of the apparatus 100 is described in further detail withreference to FIGS. 1-6 .

FIG. 2 illustrates a FTTH PON fiber network between an OLT and an ONT toillustrate operation of the apparatus 100, in accordance with an exampleof the present disclosure.

Referring to FIG. 2 , the DUT 104 may include a section of a PON networkbetween an ONT 200 and a splitter 116. In the example of FIG. 2 , thesplitter is specified as a 1×32 splitter, but may be any other type ofsplitter, and is disposed 2 km from an OLT 122. The apparatus 100 mayinclude a power meter and an optical reflectometer such as an OTDR, andmay be optically connected to the DUT 104, instead of the ONT 200. TheDUT 104 may include various components, such as a splitter 116,connector 202, splice 204, etc.

When performing a certification on the DUT 104 for a network, such as aPON network, as disclosed in further detail below with reference toFIGS. 2-6 , the relatively shorter light pulse width, for example, of 10ns, may be used to fully characterize the DUT 104. However, since therelatively shorter light pulse width may not provide enough dynamicrange to measure the splitter 116, which may be a last event (e.g.,characterized as an end of DUT, or end of fiber optic link) on the DUT104, light power level measurement may be utilized to classify the lastevent as a splitter. In this regard, the light power level measurementmay be performed on a basis that the presence of light indicates thatthere is fiber optic link beyond what was previously considered an endof the DUT.

As disclosed herein, the apparatuses, methods, and non-transitorycomputer readable media disclosed herein provide for utilization oflight power level measurement to enhance OTDR event type detection. Inthis regard, further analysis may be performed by utilizing multi-pulses(e.g., short pulse width, and then relatively long pulse width) asdisclosed herein.

For example, referring to FIGS. 1 and 2 , the power meter 102 mayperform light power level measurement 106, for example, at 1490 nm and1577 nm, for example on a live network utilizing the filtered powermeter. The light power level measurement 106 may be performed directlyon a fiber optic cable port 124 of the apparatus 100. The light powerlevel analyzer 118 may compare the light power level measurement 106 ateach wavelength 1490 nm and 1577 nm to a specified light power level(e.g., −35 dBm, which may represent a low light power level equivalentto “no” light power level) and to a light power level threshold 120 toclassify the light power level measured, for example, into threecategories.

A first category may include a no PON signal category for which thelight power level measurement 106 is below, for example, −35 dBm (e.g.,the specified light power level, or low light power level equivalent to“no” light power level as disclosed herein). For the first category,there may be no light on the PON wavelength.

A second category may include a low PON signal category for which thelight power level measurement may be below the light power levelthreshold 120, for example, of −27 dBm, but above the “no” light powerlevel (or no signal level). For the second category, the PON signal maybe too low for adequate characterization.

A third category may include a high PON signal category for which thelight power level measurement may be above the light power levelthreshold 120. For the third category, the PON signal may be consideredadequate for characterization.

With continued reference to FIGS. 1 and 2 , the OTDR event detector 108may certify the DUT 104 (which represents the fiber network from the ONT200 to the splitter 116), using a short pulse width. For example, theshort pulse width may be approximately 10 ns. The OTDR event detector108 may perform the OTDR measurement 110 to generate a result table asdescribed in further detail with reference to FIGS. 4 and 5 . Theresults table may include an indication of optical events along the DUT104.

For example, as shown in FIGS. 4 and 5 , the results include distancefrom the test unit (e.g., the apparatus 100) of an optical event at 400and 500, loss incurred (in dB) at 402 and 502, and reflectance incurred(in dB) at 404 and 504. In addition to these parameters, each opticalevent may be assigned an event type that describes the physical realityon the fiber optic link. The last event in such a process may bereferred to as an end of fiber optic link or end of DUT (e.g., event #4at 406 and 506), where FIG. 4 displays an end of a fiber optic link andFIG. 5 shows an end of DUT.

Referring again to FIGS. 1 and 2 , the power meter 102 may perform lightpower level measurement 106, for example, at 1490 nm and 1577 nm, andfurther, the OTDR event detector 108 may certify the DUT 104 (whichrepresents the fiber network from the ONT 200 to the splitter 116),using a short pulse width. In this regard, the event classifier 112 mayutilize the light power level measurement 106 to generate the eventclassification 114 to further classify the last event detected (e.g., at406 of FIGS. 4 and 506 of FIG. 5 ) at the post processing phase of theOTDR event detector 108. Thus, the event classifier 112 may utilize thelight power level measurement to generate the event classification 114to classify the last event as a splitter, instead of as an end of DUT.For example, with respect to the aforementioned first category that mayinclude a no PON signal category for which the light power levelmeasurement 106 is below, for example, −35 dBm (e.g., the “no” lightpower level), the event classifier 112 may classify an end of DUT eventtype as an end of DUT (or end of fiber optic link). With respect to thesecond category that may include a low PON signal category for which thelight power level measurement may be below the light power levelthreshold 120, for example, of −27 dBm, but above the no signal level of−35 dBm, the event classifier 112 may classify an end of DUT event typeas a splitter. Further, with respect to the third category that mayinclude a high PON signal category for which the light power levelmeasurement 106 may be above the light power level threshold 120, theevent classifier 112 may classify an end of DUT event type as asplitter.

As disclosed herein, the apparatuses, methods, and non-transitorycomputer readable media disclosed herein provide for utilization oflight power level measurement to enhance OTDR event type detection. Inthis regard, further analysis may be performed by utilizing multi-pulses(e.g., short pulse width, and then relatively long pulse width). Withrespect to the further analysis, in order to classify the event typefrom the OTDR event detector 108, the OTDR event detector 108 may addanother OTDR measurement, for example, by adding a long pulse widthmeasurement to increase an accuracy of the event classification.

In order to further enhance the classification of the event type by theOTDR event detector 108, after performing power level measurement andthen OTDR event detection with a relatively short pulse (e.g., 10 ns) todetect faults on a short link (e.g., <2 km), the event classifier 112may determine whether the event type for the end of DUT identified bythe OTDR event detector 108 can be enhanced, or whether another OTDRmeasurement at a relatively long pulse width (e.g., 1 microsecond) maybe needed to properly classify the end of the fiber optic link.

In this regard, FIG. 3 illustrates a logical flow to illustrateoperation of the OTDR event detection and light power levelmeasurement-based fiber optic link certification apparatus of FIG. 1 ,in accordance with an example of the present disclosure.

Referring to FIGS. 1 and 3 , with respect to a determination of whetheranother OTDR measurement at a relatively long pulse width (e.g., 1microsecond) may be needed, if the power measured by the power meter 102at block 300 results in a no signal determination (e.g., see firstcategory above), the OTDR event detector 108 may perform the OTDRmeasurement 110 at a relatively short pulse width (e.g., ns) at block302, and may further perform the OTDR measurement 110 at a relativelylong pulse width (e.g., 1 microsecond) at block 306 for the eventclassification by the event classifier 112 at block 308. Alternatively,if the power measured by the power meter 102 at block 300 results in aPON signal that may be too low for adequate characterization (e.g., seesecond category above), or a PON signal that may be considered adequatefor characterization (e.g., see third category above), the OTDR eventdetector 108 may perform the OTDR measurement 110 at a relatively shortpulse width (e.g., 10 ns) at block 302 for the event classification bythe event classifier 112 at block 304.

With respect to the OTDR measurement 110 at a relatively long pulsewidth (e.g., 1 microsecond) for block 306, the actual end of the DUT 104may be determined to be less than the OTDR event dead zone when testingfrom end of DUT from block 302 (e.g., case-1), more than the OTDR eventdead zone when testing from end of DUT from block 302 (e.g., case-2), orundetermined.

With continued reference to FIGS. 1-3 , the aforementioned first,second, and third categories may be specified as follows.

For the actual end of the DUT 104 that may be determined to be less thanthe OTDR event dead zone with a short pulse when testing from end of DUTfrom block 302 (e.g., case-1), this case-1 may correspond to theaforementioned first category. For example, for the first category thatmay include a no PON signal category for which the light power levelmeasurement 106 is below, for example, −35 dBm, the OTDR event detector108 may perform the OTDR measurement 110 at a relatively short pulsewidth (e.g., 10 ns) at block 302, and may further perform the OTDRmeasurement 110 at a relatively long pulse width (e.g., 1 microsecond)at block 306 for the event classification by the event classifier 112 atblock 308. In this regard, the event classifier 112 may utilize both theOTDR measurement 110 at a relatively short pulse width (e.g., 10 ns) atblock 302, and the OTDR measurement 110 at a relatively long pulse width(e.g., 1 microsecond) at block 306 to confirm the event type at the endof the DUT 104.

For the actual end of the DUT 104 that may be determined to be more thanthe OTDR event dead zone with a long pulse width when testing from endof DUT from block 302 (e.g., case-2), this case-2 may also correspond tothe aforementioned first category (e.g., where the end of fiber fromblock 306 is actually OLT 122 in the second category). For example, forthe first category that may include a no PON signal category for whichthe light power level measurement 106 is below, for example, −35 dBm(e.g., the “no” light power level value), the OTDR event detector 108may perform the OTDR measurement 110 at a relatively short pulse width(e.g., ns) at block 302, and may further perform the OTDR measurement110 at a relatively long pulse width (e.g., 1 microsecond) at block 306for the event classification by the event classifier 112 at block 308.However, in this case, the event classifier 112 may utilize both theOTDR measurement 110 at a relatively short pulse width (e.g., 10 ns) atblock 302, and the OTDR measurement 110 at a relatively long pulse width(e.g., 1 microsecond) at block 306 to determine that the event type atthe end of the DUT 104 is a splitter, but also indicate that the OLT 122is inactive.

With respect to the second category that may include the power measuredby the power meter 102 at block 300 that results in a PON signal thatmay be too low for adequate characterization, the OTDR event detector108 may perform the OTDR measurement 110 at a relatively short pulsewidth (e.g., 10 ns) at block 302 for the event classification by theevent classifier 112 at block 304. In this regard, the event classifier112 may generate the event classification 114 indicating the event as asplitter. In this case, the OTDR measurement 110 at a relatively longpulse width (e.g., 1 microsecond) at block 306 may be omitted (e.g., notperformed).

With respect to the third category that may include the PON signal thatmay be considered adequate for characterization, the OTDR event detector108 may perform the OTDR measurement 110 at a relatively short pulsewidth (e.g., 10 ns) at block 302 for the event classification by theevent classifier 112 at block 304. In this regard, the event classifier112 may generate the event classification 114 indicating the event as asplitter. In this case, the OTDR measurement 110 at a relatively longpulse width (e.g., 1 microsecond) at block 306 may be omitted (e.g., notperformed).

With respect to block 306 (e.g., the OTDR measurement 110 at arelatively long pulse width), the use of a long pulse may be based onthe assumption that there is fiber optic link connected after the end ofDUT identified at block 302, stating that the DUT 104 is indeedconnected to the splitter 116, despite the absence of light measured atblock 300. Alternatively, the use of a long pulse may provide forconfirmation that the DUT 104 ends as determined at block 302, the DUT104 is not connected to the splitter 116, or the splitter 116 is notconnected to a feeder (e.g., fiber network from the OLT 122 to splitter116).

Referring again to FIG. 1 , according to examples disclosed herein, theapparatuses, methods, and non-transitory computer readable mediadisclosed herein provide for analysis of combining of an OTDR fiber linkand event detection and light power level measurement to enhance DUTqualification and event type determination, using an opticalreflectometer such as an OTDR without disconnecting a fiber optic cable(or a fiber optic link of the fiber optic cable).

With respect to a direction from the splitter to the ONT, in order tocertify the DUT 104, a direction analyzer 126 may utilize the lightpower level measurement 106 to determine whether the apparatus 100 ispointed towards the correct equipment (e.g., the ONT, end user of thenetwork and not the OLT, or service provider). In this regard, the lightpower level measurement 106 may be performed as disclosed at block 300of FIG. 3 (e.g., a light power level measurement on specific PONwavelength (e.g., G-PON 1490 nm and XGS-PON 1577 nm)). If the presenceof light is detected, the process may end and no other measurement isperformed. Alternatively, the certification may be performed byutilizing the OTDR measurement 110.

FIG. 6 illustrates a user interface display to illustrate operation ofthe apparatus 100, in accordance with an example of the presentdisclosure.

Referring to FIGS. 3 and 6 , the user interface display 600 of theapparatus 100 may include a display of the event classification 114, forexample, at the G-PON wavelength (e.g., 1490 nm) or the XGS-PONwavelength (e.g., 1577 nm) light level. The light power levelmeasurement from block 300 may be utilized to identify the presence of asplitter with either or both wavelengths (e.g., 1490 nm and/or 1577 nmto be above −35 dBm). Yet further, although the examples disclosedherein are described with respect to G-PON wavelength (e.g., 1490 nm)and the XGS-PON wavelength (e.g., 1577 nm), the event identification mayalso be applied to other types of PON networks and similar technologies.

FIGS. 7-9 respectively illustrate an example block diagram 700, aflowchart of an example method 800, and a further example block diagram900 for OTDR event detection and light power level measurement-basedfiber optic link certification, according to examples. The block diagram700, the method 800, and the block diagram 900 may be implemented on theapparatus 100 described above with reference to FIG. 1 by way of exampleand not of limitation. The block diagram 700, the method 800, and theblock diagram 900 may be practiced in other apparatuses. In addition toshowing the block diagram 700, FIG. 7 shows hardware of the apparatus100 that may execute the instructions of the block diagram 700. Thehardware may include a processor 702, and a memory 704 storing machinereadable instructions that when executed by the processor cause theprocessor to perform the instructions of the block diagram 700. Thememory 704 may represent a non-transitory computer readable medium. FIG.8 may represent an example method for OTDR event detection and lightpower level measurement-based fiber optic link certification, and thesteps of the method. FIG. 9 may represent a non-transitory computerreadable medium 902 having stored thereon machine readable instructionsto provide OTDR event detection and light power level measurement-basedfiber optic link certification according to an example. The machinereadable instructions, when executed, cause a processor 904 to performthe instructions of the block diagram 900 also shown in FIG. 9 .

The processor 702 of FIG. 7 and/or the processor 904 of FIG. 9 mayinclude a single or multiple processors or other hardware processingcircuit, to execute the methods, functions and other processes describedherein. These methods, functions and other processes may be embodied asmachine readable instructions stored on a computer readable medium,which may be non-transitory (e.g., the non-transitory computer readablemedium 902 of FIG. 9 ), such as hardware storage devices (e.g., RAM(random access memory), ROM (read only memory), EPROM (erasable,programmable ROM), EEPROM (electrically erasable, programmable ROM),hard drives, and flash memory). The memory 704 may include a RAM, wherethe machine readable instructions and data for a processor may resideduring runtime.

Referring to FIGS. 1-7 , and particularly to the block diagram 700 shownin FIG. 7 , the memory 704 may include instructions 706 to perform, atone end of a device under test (DUT) 104 of a network, a light powerlevel measurement 106.

The processor 702 may fetch, decode, and execute the instructions 708 toperform, at the one end of the DUT 104, an OTDR measurement 110 todetect at least one event associated with the DUT 104.

The processor 702 may fetch, decode, and execute the instructions 710 togenerate, based on analysis of the light power level measurement 106 andthe OTDR measurement 110, an event classification 114 to classify the atleast one event associated with the DUT 104.

Referring to FIGS. 1-6 and 8 , and particularly FIG. 8 , for the method800, at block 802, the method may include performing, at one end of adevice under test (DUT) 104 of a network, a light power levelmeasurement 106 by determining, by the at least one hardware processor,based on an analysis of the light power level measurement, whether alight power level associated with the DUT is below a specified lightpower level, and generating, by the at least one hardware processor,based on a determination that the light power level associated with theDUT is below the specified light power level, an indication that thereis no light on a passive optical network (PON) wavelength.

At block 804, the method may include performing, at the one end of theDUT 104, an OTDR measurement 110 to detect at least one event associatedwith the DUT 104.

At block 806, the method may include generate, based on analysis of thelight power level measurement 106 and the OTDR measurement 110, an eventclassification 114 to classify the at least one event associated withthe DUT 104.

Referring to FIGS. 1-6 and 9 , and particularly FIG. 9 , for the blockdiagram 900, the non-transitory computer readable medium 902 may includeinstructions 906 to perform, at one end of a device under test (DUT) 104of a network, a light power level measurement 106 by determining, basedon an analysis of the light power level measurement, whether a lightpower level associated with the DUT is below a light power levelthreshold and above a specified light power level, and generating, basedon a determination that the light power level associated with the DUT isbelow the light power level threshold and above the specified lightpower level, an indication of a low passive optical network (PON)signal.

The processor 904 may fetch, decode, and execute the instructions 908 toperform, at the one end of the DUT 104, an OTDR measurement 110 todetect at least one event associated with the DUT 104.

The processor 904 may fetch, decode, and execute the instructions 910 togenerating, based on analysis of the light power level measurement 106and the OTDR measurement 110, an event classification 114 to classifythe at least one event associated with the DUT 104.

What has been described and illustrated herein is an example along withsome of its variations. The terms, descriptions and figures used hereinare set forth by way of illustration only and are not meant aslimitations. Many variations are possible within the spirit and scope ofthe subject matter, which is intended to be defined by the followingclaims—and their equivalents—in which all terms are meant in theirbroadest reasonable sense unless otherwise indicated.

What is claimed is:
 1. An apparatus comprising: a power meter, executedby at least one hardware processor, to perform, at one end of a deviceunder test (DUT) of a network, a light power level measurement; anoptical time-domain reflectometer (OTDR) event detector, executed by theat least one hardware processor, to perform, at the one end of the DUT,an OTDR measurement to detect at least one event associated with theDUT; and an event classifier, executed by the at least one hardwareprocessor, to generate, based on analysis of the light power levelmeasurement and the OTDR measurement, an event classification toclassify the at least one event associated with the DUT.
 2. Theapparatus according to claim 1, wherein the DUT includes a section of apassive optical network (PON) network between an optical networkterminal (ONT) and a splitter.
 3. The apparatus according to claim 1,wherein the event classifier is executed by the at least one hardwareprocessor to generate, based on analysis of the light power levelmeasurement and the OTDR measurement, the event classification toclassify the at least one event associated with the DUT by: generating,based on analysis of the light power level measurement and the OTDRmeasurement, the event classification to classify, as a splitterdisposed at a second opposite end of the DUT, the at least one eventpreviously identified by the OTDR measurement as an end of DUT.
 4. Theapparatus according to claim 1, wherein the power meter furthercomprises: a light power level analyzer, executed by the at least onehardware processor to: determine, based on an analysis of the lightpower level measurement, whether a light power level associated with theDUT is below a specified light power level; and generate, based on adetermination that the light power level associated with the DUT isbelow the specified light power level, an indication that there is nolight on a passive optical network (PON) wavelength.
 5. The apparatusaccording to claim 4, wherein the event classifier is executed by the atleast one hardware processor to generate, based on analysis of the lightpower level measurement and the OTDR measurement, the eventclassification to classify the at least one event associated with theDUT by: generating, based on the light power level measurement and theOTDR measurement at a relatively short pulse width and at a relativelylong pulse width, the event classification to classify the at least oneevent associated with the DUT as an end of DUT.
 6. The apparatusaccording to claim 5, wherein an actual end of the DUT is disposed at adistance that is less than the relatively short pulse width when testingfrom the end of the DUT determined by the OTDR measurement.
 7. Theapparatus according to claim 4, wherein the event classifier is executedby the at least one hardware processor to generate, based on analysis ofthe light power level measurement and the OTDR measurement, the eventclassification to classify the at least one event associated with theDUT by: generating, based on the light power level measurement and theOTDR measurement at a relatively short pulse width and at a relativelylong pulse width, the event classification to classify the at least oneevent associated with the DUT as an inactive optical line terminal(OLT).
 8. The apparatus according to claim 7, wherein an actual end ofthe DUT is disposed at a distance that is greater than the relativelyshort pulse width when testing from the end of the DUT determined by theOTDR measurement.
 9. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein thepower meter further comprises: a light power level analyzer, executed bythe at least one hardware processor to: determine, based on an analysisof the light power level measurement, whether a light power levelassociated with the DUT is below a light power level threshold and abovea specified light power level; and generate, based on a determinationthat the light power level associated with the DUT is below the lightpower level threshold and above the specified light power level, anindication of a low passive optical network (PON) signal.
 10. Theapparatus according to claim 9, wherein the event classifier is executedby the at least one hardware processor to generate, based on analysis ofthe light power level measurement and the OTDR measurement, the eventclassification to classify the at least one event associated with theDUT by: generating, based on the light power level measurement and theOTDR measurement at a relatively short pulse width, the eventclassification to classify the at least one event associated with theDUT as a splitter.
 11. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein thepower meter further comprises: a light power level analyzer, executed bythe at least one hardware processor to: determine, based on an analysisof the light power level measurement, whether a light power levelassociated with the DUT is above a light power level threshold; andgenerate, based on a determination that the light power level associatedwith the DUT is above the light power level threshold, an indication ofa high passive optical network (PON) signal.
 12. The apparatus accordingto claim 11, wherein the event classifier is executed by the at leastone hardware processor to generate, based on analysis of the light powerlevel measurement and the OTDR measurement, the event classification toclassify the at least one event associated with the DUT by: generating,based on the light power level measurement and the OTDR measurement at arelatively short pulse width, the event classification to classify theat least one event associated with the DUT as a splitter.
 13. A methodcomprising: performing, by at least one hardware processor, at one endof a device under test (DUT) of a network, a light power levelmeasurement by: determining, by the at least one hardware processor,based on an analysis of the light power level measurement, whether alight power level associated with the DUT is below a specified lightpower level; and generating, by the at least one hardware processor,based on a determination that the light power level associated with theDUT is below the specified light power level, an indication that thereis no light on a passive optical network (PON) wavelength; performing,by the at least one hardware processor, at the one end of the DUT, anOTDR measurement to detect at least one event associated with the DUT;and generating, by the at least one hardware processor, based onanalysis of the light power level measurement and the OTDR measurement,an event classification to classify the at least one event associatedwith the DUT.
 14. The method according to claim 13, wherein generating,by the at least one hardware processor, based on the analysis of thelight power level measurement and the OTDR measurement, the eventclassification to classify the at least one event associated with theDUT further comprises: generating, by the at least one hardwareprocessor, based on the light power level measurement and the OTDRmeasurement at a relatively short pulse width and at a relatively longpulse width, the event classification to classify the at least one eventassociated with the DUT as an end of DUT.
 15. The method according toclaim 14, wherein an actual end of the DUT is disposed at a distancethat is less than the relatively short pulse width when testing from theend of the DUT determined by the OTDR measurement.
 16. The methodaccording to claim 13, wherein the DUT includes a section of a PONnetwork between an optical network terminal (ONT) and a splitter. 17.The method according to claim 13, wherein generating, by the at leastone hardware processor, based on the analysis of the light power levelmeasurement and the OTDR measurement, the event classification toclassify the at least one event associated with the DUT furthercomprises: generating, by the at least one hardware processor, based onthe analysis of the light power level measurement and the OTDRmeasurement, the event classification to classify, as a splitterdisposed at a second opposite end of the DUT, the at least one eventpreviously identified by the OTDR measurement as an end of DUT.
 18. Anon-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon machinereadable instructions, the machine readable instructions, when executedby at least one hardware processor, cause the at least one hardwareprocessor to: perform, at one end of a device under test (DUT) of anetwork, a light power level measurement by: determining, based on ananalysis of the light power level measurement, whether a light powerlevel associated with the DUT is below a light power level threshold andabove a specified light power level; and generating, based on adetermination that the light power level associated with the DUT isbelow the light power level threshold and above the specified lightpower level, an indication of a low passive optical network (PON)signal; perform, at the one end of the DUT, an OTDR measurement todetect at least one event associated with the DUT; and generate, basedon analysis of the light power level measurement and the OTDRmeasurement, an event classification to classify the at least one eventassociated with the DUT.
 19. The non-transitory computer readable mediumaccording to claim 18, wherein the machine readable instructions togenerate, based on the analysis of the light power level measurement andthe OTDR measurement, the event classification to classify the at leastone event associated with the DUT, when executed by the at least onehardware processor, further cause the at least one hardware processorto: generate, based on the light power level measurement and the OTDRmeasurement at a relatively short pulse width, the event classificationto classify the at least one event associated with the DUT as asplitter.
 20. The non-transitory computer readable medium according toclaim 18, wherein the DUT includes a section of a PON network between anoptical network terminal (ONT) and a splitter.